To sustainability, and beyond. By any means possible.
Search
RSS Feed 
Recent comments
- Hugh MacLeod: Thanks, Tim… though I have to say, “Social Object Factory” was my business...
- timkitchin: Doc, for the record I totally buy into the individual-centric relational perspective. Just extend it...
- Doc Searls: Hi Tim. For what it’s worth, I’ve seen VRM from the beginning as more of an individual than a...
- Tim: I can get down to 1.6 Ben unless I move to a ’small’ house with my wife & 3 children.Need to...
- Ben Evetts: According to this calculator we’re all completely shot. Even using the lowest variables i could get...
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- November 2010
- March 2010
- April 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- May 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
Blogroll
Built for accessibility: W3C | CSS
Site Design and Maintainance by Dan Hill of Serene Studios
VRM Evolution – the role of social capital
The rather reductionistically-named discipline of VRM (Vendor Relationship Management) continues to acquire intellectu...
November 10, 2008
The rather reductionistically-named discipline of VRM (Vendor Relationship Management) continues to acquire intellectual traction…notable contributions from my old friend and colleague, Peter Parkes, and others, who are working to operationalise the principles of Project VRM.
Now there will always be tensions in VRM between those who approach it from a values-based standpoint of individualism and those who see it merely as a source of efficiency gains - the value perspective. Clearly, for it to work, both perspectives must fuse together…and both are also a red herring in some ways.
The truth is a fusion of the two perspectives. I have expressed this, rather clumsily in the past, as ‘Would Like to Meet’ WLTM commerce – envisaging VRM as a form of social brokerage.
However another, simpler way to see VRM in terms of human and social capital.VRM may be seen as a set of processes by which enable us to gain a return on human capital (skills, knowledge, competence etc) through interaction with social networks.
The challenge of VRM lies simply in constructing and maintaining productive capital transformation systems. The systems should:
1. Accurately identify and recognise the value of hidden assets
2. Connect those human assets to the individuals best placed to use them
3. Ensure a fair price is paid for the trade assets
4. Capture exchange-value for the individual and the collective while leaving enough surplus value within the social system…
The success or otherwise, or VRM will thus some down to a number of questions
1. Developing dynamically standardised envaluation mechanisms – such as peer reputation or knowledge extensity
2. Increasing networked resource-transparency – via mechanisms like Mine! or some putative GoogleMe application…
3. Developing market-based mechanisms to pre-filter the quality of demand and supply
4. Ensuring that toxic transactions – e.g. where relationship expectations are mismatched – are isolated and dealt with via some form of remediation system.
So there you go
Comment by Doc Searls — November 19, 2008 10:52 pm
Hi Tim.
For what it’s worth, I’ve seen VRM from the beginning as more of an individual than a social matter: equipping customers with tools that make them both independent from vendors and better able to engage with vendors.
It’s about demand driving supply at least as well as supply drives demand.
While VRM does have some early traction, we have a lot of heads-down work to do, writing code and putting proof in future puddings.
As for the reductionistic nature of the initialism, it’s just something that showed up. We had been talking about it for some time, but when Mike Vizard called it “VRM” on a Gillmor Gang podcast, the baby got named. Before that, little traction; after that, lots more traction.
In the long run we’ll have GRM for government relationship management and ORM for organization relationship management too. Meanwhile VRM will have to do until a better name comes along.
Cheers,
Doc
Comment by timkitchin — November 20, 2008 1:21 am
Doc, for the record I totally buy into the individual-centric relational perspective. Just extend it somewhat: Not just procurement, but selling too. Not just to institutions, but to other individuals. Not just physical products, but all services. In this conception using radical, granular and privacy-safe demand transparency drives dramatic improvements in efficiency and certainly in human effectiveness…
And yes we probably need to just get some stuff built before we get too angsty about it.
Leave a comment