To sustainability, and beyond. By any means possible.
Search
RSS Feed 
Recent comments
- Hugh MacLeod: Thanks, Tim… though I have to say, “Social Object Factory” was my business...
- timkitchin: Doc, for the record I totally buy into the individual-centric relational perspective. Just extend it...
- Doc Searls: Hi Tim. For what it’s worth, I’ve seen VRM from the beginning as more of an individual than a...
- Tim: I can get down to 1.6 Ben unless I move to a ’small’ house with my wife & 3 children.Need to...
- Ben Evetts: According to this calculator we’re all completely shot. Even using the lowest variables i could get...
Archives
- November 2012
- June 2012
- March 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- November 2010
- March 2010
- April 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- May 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
Blogroll
Built for accessibility: W3C | CSS
Site Design and Maintainance by Dan Hill of Serene Studios
Blatancy and the #SocialObjectFactory
With apologies to @gapingvoid (Hugh Macleod) I described his latest venture as showing 'blatancy' on twitter. I meant ...
March 21, 2012
With apologies to @gapingvoid (Hugh Macleod) I described his latest venture as showing ‘blatancy’ on twitter. I meant it well*.
The first thing I meant is ‘authenticity’ – Everything he does is driven by exuberance for a belief system that he consistently advocates…
The second thing I meant is ’simplicity’. Hugh has reduced the entire proposition down to an animated icon and a promise. As someone whose ‘business’ is words, crafting “Stories about Strategy” I am in awe of the suggestive power of images to cut across our reservations. Disagreements about words become a cause of demolition. Disagreements about images are an excuse for construction.
The third thing I meant is ‘directness’. There is a ‘buy my stuff’ abruptness to the execution which is disarming to a 19th Century Brit like me…
The fourth thing I meant is that there is an ‘aggression’ of conceptualisation. I have written elaborately in the past on memetic branding, along with Mike Cayley and also on brands as producers of connectivity. In Hugh’s mind brands simply become ‘Cannons’ puffing out memetic cannon balls… the visual language removes the need for analytical and captures the essence of the idea. More importantly, it is a productive, energetic and kinetic image, which makes brand owners feel as if they are in control.
Fifthly I was evoking ‘commitment’. Hugh’s basic concept here, as I see it, is to move away from a typical agency focus on the production process, and also to move away from a consultancy focus on outcomes. Instead he confidently assumes the outcomes and trusts his track record for the production process, and focuses instead on the ’stuff’ itself.
Any traditional agency could think this strategic insight but none that I know would commit to the idea so far as to name the business after the process. They’d be too busy trying to define some much looser discriminator based on ‘modes of engagement’ – or just name it after the founder. Not Hugh.
So Blatancy rules. Underthink and Overcommit. This is the spirit of the age.
#SocialObjectFactory, is the ur-zeitgeist.
I’ll say it once more for effect: “Innovation is Simplification”.
*And on a related note, in my defence, I defer, once again, to Humpty Dumpty:
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master that’s all.”
Comment by Hugh MacLeod — March 21, 2012 9:56 am
Thanks, Tim… though I have to say, “Social Object Factory” was my business partner’s idea… trying to define what we do beyond “Hugh, The Cartoonist” and all that brand personality crap
Leave a comment